Page:Thesaurus Palaeohibernicus 2.djvu/236

This page has not been proofread.
190
Non-Biblical Glosses and Scholia.

'qiiis fecit?' 'ego' — relatio uero secundam" cognitionem significat, ut 'is,' 'de quo iam dixi^l' lure igitur 'hie",' quod primani cogni- tionem indicat, praeponitur, unde et 'praepositiuuin' nominatur, 'is' autem, quod secundam cognitionem significat, subiungitur, unde ef* 'subiunctiuum' pro merito nuncupatur, quod redigat'^ in memoriam 5 cognitionis primae"', ut si dicam : 'Aeueas filius fuit Veneris; is est qui^" uicit Turnum.' 'Ipse"" quoque in tertia persona per se, ut dictum est, positum ad recordatiouem personae refertur iam cognitae"; P. 198 a recte igitur demonstrationem, quae significatur per 'ille' et 'iste' pronomina, reparat memoriae' pronomen, <piod est 'ipse': non tamen 10 etiam 'ille' et 'iste' referri ad pronomen 'ipse' possunt-. Prima enim cognitio est per demonstratiua pronomina, secunda uero per relatiua^. Figurae'* enim uel discretionis uel significantiae causa* primae et secundae adiungitur. Quod autem tertiae est, ostenditur (I. p. 580) ex eo quod dicimus" 'ego feci,' 'tu fecisti,' 'ipse fecit,* et quod tertiae


11. .i. iar netargnu riam 12, .i. inti diarohe briathar linn riam 13. foilsigud hi frecndsiwc^ 14. ol atairhir 15. .i. atairhert hi/orathmet innapersine immeroraid riam 16. .i. inti adruhartma?' ' 17. .i. cenacomoi naich aili do airdianaccomaltar pronomen naill do oetet som iarum do suidiu • • 18. .i. diambi 20 foraithmet riam

1. .i. is ipronomen naithfoilsigthech doib ipse 2. nicumcat camaiph ille 7 iste beta naithfoilsigthecha dondi as ipse airis cetna netargnw sluindes ipse intan as foilsigthech .i. intan ihbis lasani asego" tu ?io'^ immalle • > 3. .1. istoisigiu didiu a cetna netargnw 25 inchoisechar per ille 7 iste (juam anetargne tanaise bis per ipse 4. .i. condib imdu de torand imiaforgnuso 5. .i. do chinniud innapersine 7 dia declior frialaili 7 is sinonn noen discretio 7 significtwj^m • • ■ 6. .i. iscoimdig linn inso


11. i.e. after previous cognition. 12. i.e. he of whom we have 30 spoken before. 13. demonstration in presence. 14. because it brings again. 15. i.e. bringing again into recollection of the person that he has spoken of before. 16. i.e. he whom we liave mentioned. 17. i.e. without joining any other to it, for if another pronoun be joined to it, it (sc. ipse) is in subjection to it. 18. i.e. of which there a is mention before.

1. i.e. to them ipse is a re-demonstrative pronoun. 2. Ule and iste, however, cannot be re-demonstrative to ipse, for iptse expresses together the first cognition when it is a demonstrative, i.e. when it is with ego or tu. 3. i.e. the first cognition, then, which is signified by ille and iste 40 is earlier than the second cognition which is (expressed) by ipse. 4. i.e. so that the sign of the figure may be the more abundant. 5. i.e. to define the person and to distinguish it from another, and discretio and significantia are just the same. 6. i.e. this is customary with us. [1] [2] [3]

[4]

  1. MS. et et
  2. cf. Sg. 204» 4
  3. s under the line
  4. here no seems to have been written by mistake, and it is omitted in the transla- tion, cf. Ml. 87" 17