Wikisource:Proposed deletions/Archive 2016

This page collects done requests for deleting specific articles from Wikisource, 2016.

Other archives see here.

January 2016

સો વરસનો થા

Copyvio, as suggested here.

Probably copyright of other uploads of User:Dsvyas should be checked. Ankry (talk) 11:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please delete this, it was created in my early days, when I was not aware of copyright terms. We have deleted it from gu.wikisource as well.--Dsvyas (talk) 14:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Deleted. Ankry (talk) 23:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

works by કવિ દાદ

In Category:કવિ દાદ there are two works:

that were deleted in guwikisource (after moving there) as copyright violation (works of modern author; see discussion here). I think it is unlikely that they are PD in US (eg. as published before 1923 or for another reason). Uploaders notified. Ankry (talk) 21:35, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done -jkb- (talk) 00:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of redirects

Here three bot-generated pages with a wrong name:

I apologyze for my mistake. --Alex brollo (talk) 08:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Ooswesthoesbes (talk) 11:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ALLAH-Book.pdf

File:ALLAH-Book.pdf + another about 108 associated pages, proposed by Ankry in Nov 2015: shouln't we ask somebody with a bot to delete it? Just like User:DerHexer last time? -jkb- (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Deleted manually. Ankry (talk) 21:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UserPage

Patio (talk) TIA, 12:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done -jkb- (talk) 12:55, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perlembagaan Parti Keadilan Rakyat

I guess this is a political spam, something like a programm of a Malayan political party, see the notice on the beginnig of the article an go to google translator. Thus, out of scope and good to be deleted. -jkb- (talk) 18:30, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And most probably some more party programms, see the contributions of Joanna20, I will let message there. Naturally, the question of copyvio is acute as well. -jkb- (talk) 18:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This webpage is not available. The constitution can be referred from this link (reliable sources because the blog is owned by the Parti Keadilan's branch, Kimanis). Joanna20 (talk) 19:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that content is CC-BY-SA 3.0 licensed or in Public Domain. @Joanna20: plase add a valid license tag and elaborate why the chosen one is valid. Ankry (talk) 19:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Joanna20: as I see that you continue to work on the mentioned pages: could you please clear the licence question first? Thanks in advance, -jkb- (talk) 07:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

w:WordPress is a free and open-source content management system (CMS) based on PHP and MySQL. I use this WordPress link as a source of the text of Perlembagaan Parti Keadilan Rakyat. What's your opinion? Joanna20 (talk) 16:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joanna20, thanks for your answer. I am afraid we have a small misunderstanding here. On the pages w:WordPress and https://wordpress.org/ as well you can read that word press is a free software and free webspace; this is something quite different from a fee licence. The page https://keadilankimanis.wordpress.com/perlembagaan-2/ is then a blog of the political party. What we need is s source where we can see very clearly that the text i.e. the content i.e. the party programm is published under a free licence like public domain or CC. When there is no notice like this so it has no meanig as in the internet you can find millions of pages without licence - copyfraud, copyright violation etc. This what I said concerns the pages:

Otherwise we would need an email confirmations from the parties that all the texts are provided under a free licence. Regards a cheers, -jkb- (talk) 22:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Joanna20:, there is another question arising and I would like an answer from you (note the above edit from me as well), as I see that the party programm pages here are the 1 : 1 copies of your articles on ms.wikipedia.org, see here and here, and the Wikisource is not for duplicates. So, nice weekend for you, -jkb- (talk) 16:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Despite the discussion here the user Joanna20 gave no answer and continued editing the pages today. There are no doubts that the text are not free or they are even copyrigted, see the deletion comments. Thus I had to delete them. If free licence would be provided, the pages can be restored. I deleted the user page of Joanna20 as well as there was a copy of the copyvio text Perlembagaan Parti Keadilan Rakyat only. Regards, -jkb- (talk) 10:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done -jkb- (talk) 10:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What party programm really means?? Is it typo for party programme or something else? Free licence for party constitution? Well, readers out there are expected to read the text of party constitution in the respective party website, not from Wikisource. I provide website links for party constitution in the Wikipedia. That is enough for providing information to the future interested readers. Happy editing. :) Joanna20 (talk) 10:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not forget to delete Category:Perlembagaan parti politik di Malaysia. Reason: Empty page.. Joanna20 (talk) 11:09, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

//edit confl.// Please read en:Wikisource:What Wikisource includes and en:Wikisource:Copyright policy. Regards. -jkb- (talk) 11:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page/Лезги and Category:Лезги

Unneeded: no texts in this language. They may be restored if a text appears. Ankry (talk) 08:42, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ooswesthoesbes: can you comment here, please, if you disagree? Ankry (talk) 16:04, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think the main page should be kept anyway, although without own text pages; the category - well, to be or not to be, that is the question ... :-) -jkb- (talk) 17:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think, that if we leave the main page, we should also leave the category the main page belongs to. I just had doubts that having the main page while there is no text in this laguage may mislead users searching for texts. Ankry (talk) 18:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would very much disagree with deleting those pages just for the sake of deleting them. The main page and category can serve as a placeholder from which a possible future project can be set up; pretty much the same way as the incubator has them. I have never heard of anyone on the incubator complaining that they are misleading, although I must admit that the projects on the incubator are no wikisources of course :) --Ooswesthoesbes (talk) 22:20, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Closing as rejected. Ankry (talk) 07:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong code nsPages

Please delete these pages:

They come from a bot mistake by User:BrolloBot driven by me, I apologyze, and for some reason mediawiki software doesn't see them as "nsPage pages". They have been wrongly created initially as ns0 pages (first mistake) then moved into nsPage (second mistake); I never will repeat this mistake, I apologyze. Can I fix this strange thing by myself, without sysop privileges? If I can, please tell me how I can help. --Alex brollo (talk) 16:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Alex brollo:, that is realy no problem :-) regards -jkb- (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done -jkb- (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan redirects also deleted. Some time ago an error was genereted that prevented moving pages between namespaces that uses different content model. Your case shows it is no longer (or not always). What to say: Mediawiki is buggy software and we have to deal with this. Ankry (talk) 17:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Misterious files

Something rare happens with File:Free Culture.png. It is not used (and it does not seem that it will be used any time in the future in this Wikisource) and there is a duplicated in Commons as a GIF file (commons:File:Free Culture Cover.gif, instead of PNG file). But if I try to edit it for adding the {{delete}} template, it doesn't exist?! It was created by "Conversion script" and it has no upload log. Are you able to delete it? Thanks! :) -Aleator 00:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same happens to this one: File:Image.jpg.-Aleator 01:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These were files with no associated file description page in the File namespace. After description pages are created, they can be editted and any info added to them. Ankry (talk) 15:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Both files deleted as copyright violation, however. Tha latter one was covering a Commons file which is now available. Ankry (talk) 15:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done

nap localisation efforts

moved page creaded by luisation-trick here: Category:Innece napulitane finite. It would be great if you can help us removing it. Thanks a lot!--C.R. (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Ooswesthoesbes. Ankry (talk) 15:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ns0 empty pages that can be deleted

Here some pages created by my bot without the prefix Page:.

From:

Gente 'e mala vita (1897) - Ferdinando Russo.djvu/1

To:

Gente 'e mala vita (1897) - Ferdinando Russo.djvu/13

Thanks --Alex brollo (talk) 19:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Ankry & me -jkb- (talk) 23:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cara buat situs di wikipedia

Cara buat situs di wikipedia. It's a Wikipedia like page, written in Indonesian, and doesn't seem to me it's a text suitable for Wikisource. I think it's spam about a certain organization (check it with Google Translator; the user only has 1 edition in all WMF wikis; this organization doesn't have any own page in id.wikipedia). -Aleator 20:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done yes, I think so as well, more over no licence, no source. By the way, there is a id.source. -jkb- (talk) 20:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

texts of Sergei Mikhalkov

According to GT the following texts in Mingrelian:

are texts of Sergei Mikhalkov (სერგეი მიხალკოვი) (I also think they are translations as I did not find anywhere information that Mikhalkov was speaking Mingrelian) who died in 2009. @Agi, მარგალონა: unless you can provide a proof that theese texts were

published before 1.1.1923 or
in public domain in the country of their first publication on 1.1.1996 (assuming Russia for the Russian original and Georgia for the Mingrelian translation) or
freely licensed by the author and translator (or their heirs)

they are copyright violations and should not appear on wikisource less than 95 years from their first known publication or before 1.1.2080 (70 pma). Any comments? Ankry (talk) 08:09, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Deleted by Ooswesthoesbes Ankry (talk) 13:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Nap/Dati

The page Module:Nap/Dati is empty by now, and can be deleted. It's only linked, by mention, into a couple of talk pages, where its brief live has been discussed :-) --Alex brollo (talk) 07:57, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ankry (talk) 10:18, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

File:Wikisource edit.jpg

Unused. No source or license.--Jusjih (talk) 00:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done VIGNERON (talk) 16:37, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dawut jultyi qan (1).pdf

Unused. No source or license.--Jusjih (talk) 00:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Саган: can you provide a source and a license? Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 16:37, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dawut jultyi died in 1938. Is his works are not free?--Саган (talk) 07:08, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Саган: It depends whether, when and where it was published the first time. As we need to know whether it was PD in country of the first publication on 1.1.1996 and whether anybody else contributed to this work while publishing (or was it original author's publication).

If the work was never published it may be even out of wikisource scope. Ankry (talk) 20:34, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And if the file IS PD in both US and the source country: why do not upload it to Commons? Ankry (talk) 20:41, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted for now.--Jusjih (talk) 00:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions of User Исатай Бердалиев

Probably all edits by the user User:Исатай Бердалиев are copyvios, without any source, and probably own texts. See contribs. -jkb- (talk) 20:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Started deletion.--Jusjih (talk) 00:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted all edits in the Main namespace.--Jusjih (talk) 19:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Korean Orthography

This text is mixed with Korean and English. If copyright-okay, original Korean text belongs to Korean Wikisource and licensed English translation belongs to English Wikisource.--Jusjih (talk) 01:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a partial translation of ko:대한민국 한글 맞춤법(제2014-39호). As the contributor has not specified the translation license or source, should we send it to English Wikisource as wiki user translation or just delete it?--Jusjih (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At present it is no translation - it is simply a start of a translation. The only one edit with something new was that of the IP on June 3rd; all other edits were corrections, typos etc. Isthere any chance it will be finished? If not we can delete it. -jkb- (talk) 21:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As the original Korean work with the same title has been amended over years, I am considering exporting it to b:Korean as a new sub page.--Jusjih (talk) 00:50, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As a Wikibooks administrator, I kindly inform you that b:Special:Import offers only s: and not oldwikisource:. So the page should be copied, at least in a first time. JackPotte (talk) 11:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI b:Wikibooks:Requests_for_import#Import_from_Old_Wikisource is voting to allow this importation with Phabricator. JackPotte (talk) 10:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatively: somebody apply for the import rights (import upload). -jkb- (talk) 13:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Or I may import from Old Wikisource to English Wikisoure, then from English Wikisource to English Wikibooks.--Jusjih (talk) 01:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably the easiest way todo. -jkb- (talk) 11:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

s:Special:Import has stopped working, so I just exported Korean Orthography through English Wikiquote where I am an imported, then imported to English Wikibooks. Ready to delete the page here.--Jusjih (talk) 00:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done -jkb- (talk) 17:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Šwec a čert

Duplicate of Šewc a čert with a typo in the title.--Tchoř (talk) 17:51, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done - a díky za upozornění - -jkb- (talk) 23:04, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Index:Costituziun per il Cantun Grischun (1854)

Hi! I suggest deleting those 3 pages:

Nothing links to them. There is another index page: Index:Costituziun per il Cantun Grischun (1854).pdf, which is the source for the transclusion Costituziun per il Cantun Grischun (1854), and whose PDF file comes from the same source than the .gif files of the first index (based on Commons information). Best regards! -Aleator 22:01, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Deleted as duplicates. Ankry (talk) 14:06, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Телебеҙҙе кем боҙа. Миңһылыу Усманова

1. Text of a living author, no cc-by-sa-3.0 permission provided. Source site (http://bashgazet.ru/) is marked "Copyright © 2011-2015 — All Rights Reserved."
2. I am afraid similar problem applies to all uploads of this user as they seem not to understand what copyright is. Any hints?
Ankry (talk) 15:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Телебеҙҙе кем боҙа. Миңһылыу Усманова deleted. -jkb- (talk) 14:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The new page creations of the user are shown here. Yepp, in these countries the word "copyright" seems to be unknown. I guess we shall have to delete it (or the most of them). -jkb- (talk) 14:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mein Kampf

Mein Kampf with all subpages should be deleted - it is out of scope as there is the German Wikisource (beside the fact that the Wikimedia projects do not need necessarily such texts without any comment [!]); the discussion on this topics can be found here: de:Diskussion:Mein Kampf#Bitte geoffnet. -jkb- (talk) 14:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

and here: Wikisource:Scriptorium#Mein Kampf in German --WikiAnika (talk) 07:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to the linked (by Anika) talk in Scriptorium I will delete the pages somewhen on saturday (tommorow) with the rationale "not appropriate here" unless a serious disagreement occures. -jkb- (talk) 15:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have deleted the text according to the discussion - see Wikisource:Scriptorium#Mein Kampf in German; more over some users on dewiki have found some OCR or copy&paste deficits in the text that are not in the given source on archive.org; also the formating was not OK. @Wetitpig0: sorry for it, you surely spended a lot of time for this item, but, as the reason for the deleting shows, it was "not appropriate here". Regards. -jkb- (talk) 23:29, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Template:PD-UK-EdictGov

See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-UK-EdictGov. – Kaihsu (talk) 04:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it seems to be so; see also what links here - three articles. -jkb- (talk) 08:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
While all uses of this template are clearly misuses, I doubt the texts using it should be deleted. The bilateral treaty is covered (in commons) by "PD-US-no notice" as an UN, not UK document. The 2 others seem to be not eligigle for copyright (according to The Malaysian Copyright Act 1987), so also URAA does not apply to them. Ankry (talk) 13:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, @Ankry: just to be sure what you mean: your proposal, as far as I understand, is:

to keep all three texts that are using the template PD-UK-EdictGov - but the the template should be removed from these texts and the licence there should be provided by another templates - shouldn't it?
the template itself should be deleted - schoud't it?

-jkb- (talk) 23:23, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@-jkb-: exactly. Ankry (talk) 09:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I concur: delete the template, keep the texts. – Kaihsu (talk) 18:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. I will do it in the next two days if there are no objections. But we probably need another licence for the texts... -jkb- (talk) 18:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done -jkb- (talk) 09:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Index:Clerck 1757 Svenska Spindlar - Aranei Svecici.pdf‎

Index and proofreading moved to respective subdomains (sv and la) in 2014.--Thurs (talk) 08:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ankry (talk) 20:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

სიზმარი ობლისა

Vandalism and nonsence. In order to see that the page is vandal — just put the text in the Google Translate (using language auto-detection). --Nigmont (talk) 10:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done and protected - it was the third time.., Thanks, -jkb- (talk) 11:09, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bakul P. Sharma

Maybe the user created the text with uncertain language, source, and license.--Jusjih (talk) 21:04, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it's gujarati. @Yann, Satdeep Gill: -jkb- (talk) 23:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC) - - - But yes, anyway: no licence, no year, no source.[reply]

Yes, it's gujarati. Yann (talk) 23:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then it should be moved to gu.ws and finally deleted here - @Aleator: - you have much more experience with this ... :-) regards -jkb- (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The text is already there on Gujarati Wikisource.--Satdeep Gill (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done OK, thanks, deleted here. -jkb- (talk) 08:02, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Music files

Music files with no author, no copyright status and no description, and out of scope:

User (I think he's a kid) has been warned: User talk:Francisco Esperança#Music_files.-Aleator 19:17, 6 December 2016 (UTC) Done by -jkb- (talk) 19:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some unused unsourced files

File:Tamil Calendar for Vijaya year 2013-2014.pdf, not used and exact duplicate of c:File:Tamil Calendar 2013.pdf.
Files uploaded by @Lusanaherandraton: (not used and duplicated at Commons, and used now in s:en:Page:Three Books of Occult Philosophy (De Occulta Philosophia) (1651).djvu/346):

~~:*File:Agrippa1531 Pleiades.png (c:File:Pleiades (Agrippa 1531).svg)~~ ~~:*File:Agrippa1531 caputAlgol.png (c:File:Algol symbol (Agripe 1531).svg)~~ Thanks. -Aleator 17:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Aleator: could you, please, split theese into few section to make discussion about these files easier? About files used in Yann's discussion we should ask Yann. Files with exact duplicates in Commons should be speedily deleted (and, if used, links to them fixed). File:Lbpaul 001.jpg is not exact duplicate of the huwiki/commons file (which contains a watermark/logo) Ankry (talk) 16:58, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These can be deleted. Yann (talk) 18:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I've moved the nominations of those files still not deleted, into the next sections, added "exact duplicate" if they are, reviewed they are not in use. I've removed 2 files that were not duplicate. -Aleator 20:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patro nia.PNG

File:Patro nia.PNG, user made image of raw text similar to Patro Nia (Ido) (where it was added before I removed it).-Aleator 20:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Ankry (talk) 14:23, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Satdeep Gill (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by @Tomahawk_Cheerocky~sourceswiki:

They are not used, not linked, no license, most out of scope, some related to writer/user @Tomislav Dretar:. It seems they intended to be a decoration for a bs.text:

File:Tomislav Dretar.jpg (not exact duplicate of s:bs:Datoteka:TomislavDretar.jpg).
File:Galava.JPG (raw text user made image).
File:Glava002.JPG (raw text user made image).
File:Cro sv.JPG, File:Cro cro.JPG, File:Corner dtr.JPG, File:Corner dtr.GIF, File:Corner dt.JPG, File:Corner cro rd.JPG, File:Corner cro r.gif (used only in User_talk:Yann#M.C3.A9diation), File:Corner cro ld.JPG and File:Corner cro.JPG.

-Aleator 20:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted all.--Jusjih (talk) 02:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-USGov-NASA

Curently unused. And unlikely to be used as any NASA materials covered by this template should go to Commons. Ankry (talk) 18:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support-Aleator 18:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support --LadyInGrey (talk) 01:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Satdeep Gill (talk) 16:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir William Johnson.png

File not used, with a similar resolution (2,646 × 4,176 pixels) file on Commons: c:File:Sir William Johnson.png. -Aleator 18:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Already on Commons. Ankry (talk) 14:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo 2016-12-12 22-45-25.jpg

Unused. No license, maybe copyvio Ankry (talk) 10:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Satdeep Gill (talk) 16:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poesie - Salvatore Di Giacomo pp150-151.djvu

This was a parked djvu for including two pages that I left in the middle while fast hand scanning. It seems that it was repaired by @Ankry: here, thanks a lot! and so both pages are not needed anymore as a separate file here in wikisource.--C.R. (talk) 22:37, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ankry (talk) 06:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Khmer duplicated file

Those files are exact duplicates: File:Kambuja Suriya 1965 Issue 6.pdf and File:Kambuja Suriya 1966 Issue 6.pdf. Which one is the correct one, 1965 or 1966? No feedback from User_talk:ទេព_សុវិចិត្រ#Duplicated file. After looking close to w:en:Khmer numerals, and to other books from 1966 (កម្ពុជសុរិយា/ឆ្នាំទី៣៨) and 1965 (កម្ពុជសុរិយា/ឆ្នាំទី៣៧), I think that the PDF says "1966". -Aleator 16:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He seems to have overridden the 1965 page. I think the earlier version might be the original. --Ooswesthoesbes (talk) 09:32, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]